Seattle Municipal Bank–A Future for Us All

by Matt Remle and Nikkita Oliver

It was in early August 2016, as bulldozers desecrated grave sites and sacred lands along the Cannonball River on the Standing Rock Sioux reservation.  As private security unleashed attack dogs on water protectors, it became clear our efforts to stop the Dakota Access pipeline through our moral, Tribal and environmental arguments were less and less effective.

Just one day before the mass desecration, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s historic preservation officer handed to a judge a detailed map of where these burial sites and sacred sites were located.  To Energy Transfer Partners, the Army Corp of Engineers and the State of North Dakota, the destruction of the bones of our ancestors, sacred sites, violation of Treaty rights and the contamination of our drinking water were simply not compelling enough reasons to not build the massive oil pipeline.

That said, our resistance is not in vain. Because of Standing Rock and our united front opposing the DAPL many non-indigenous peoples have been awakened to the continued repression of Native peoples at the hands of the United States government and the fossil fuel industry. While this awareness has not stopped oil from flowing through the pipeline it has expanded our resistance and diversified our tactics.

It is abundantly clear the federal, state, and local governments, as well as the oil giant Energy Transfer Partners and the banks financing the pipeline, do not care about our moral, environmental, human and Tribal rights. However, they do care about money. In this instance the old adage is true, “Money talks.” So we shift our tactics and direct energy towards getting individuals, Tribes, universities, and cities to divest from the banks, like Wells Fargo, financing the Dakota Access pipeline.

We’ve made significant strides forward working with members of the Seattle city council, in particular councilmember Kshama Sawant, to craft an ordinance to end Seattle’s $3 billon per-year relationship with Wells Fargo.

From the onset of this movement we have been clear that simply ending the cities relationship with Wells Fargo and shifting city funds to another Wall Street bank equally involved in financing the Dakota Access pipeline—as well other human, civil and environmental rights abuses, is not a victory. An effective movement for divestment is intersectional and acknowledges the relationship between problematic banking institutions and the continued oppression of indigenous, black and brown peoples both local and globally.

The Dakota Access Pipeline is not the only reason for the City of Seattle to end its relationship with Wells Fargo (and other disreputable financial institutions). Wells Fargo is a major financer of the GEO Group, a private prison company profiting off the mass incarceration of Black and brown peoples.  They’ve also engaged in unscrupulous and predatory banking and lending practices targeting predominately students and low-income communities of color.

In February, Seattle made history as the first city to divest from Wells Fargo.

Organizers from the local Native community with support from allies, launched the Mazaska Talks global divestment movement successfully. Soon after Seattle divested a rip tide of global momentum took hold with individuals, cities, universities, and tribes all taking similar action to divest.

The immediate question following the Seattle vote was who should Seattle bank with given other Wall Street banks are equally disreputable in their practices? The answer being the city needs to create its own municipal bank bank free of Wall Street influence where we can ensure Seattle’s money is not used to finance human rights violations, pipelines, private prisons, or immigration detention centers.

A municipal bank where we can see the City’s money, our money, re-invested into the people of Seattle; a bank where its first and primary mandate is the public interest of our city and its residents; a bank guided by and invested in the values of our “progressive” city.

A municipal bank sounds exciting, but is it even possible?

Yes, we are not the first city to consider this. It can be done and we, Seattle, are on our way to do it. This last budget session—in partnership with environmentalists, prison divestment organizers, and members of the Native and Black communities—the Seattle City Council approved $100k to complete a public bank study.  The goal of this study is to investigate the feasibility of a municipal bank, the benefits, and how this shift will provide Seattle with more financial capital to address crisis such as affordability, housing, and homelessness.

This is about so much more than a publicly owned city bank. This is about our vision, our values, and, most importantly, our shared future and existence. First peoples own, occupy or use about 25 percent of the world’s surface area, and yet safeguard 80 percent of the world’s remaining biodiversity. The continued resistance of indigenous people has awakened many non-indigenous peoples’ sense and desire to live in ways that protect our natural resources and our shared human existence.

Resistance and divestment are not enough. We must also build the world we most need to see. This includes establishing shared financial institutions which, like us, also protect our natural resources and shared human existence. Our future–all of our futures–depends on it.


Featured image is a cc licensed photo attributed to Jon Seattle

 

14 thoughts on “Seattle Municipal Bank–A Future for Us All”

  1. End result of this would be centralized, government control, of the local economy. Communism light and communism local. We know what happens with that kind of centralized power. The answer is more de-centralization. Leave the banks and investment firms as they are but break them up and make them smaller. More checks, balances, and competition, rather than the oligopoly in finance that Remle and Oliver correctly identify. Right problem with a fail for a proposed solution.

    Like

  2. I think a municipal bank is a great idea. It’s too bad you had to introduce it with a nine-paragraph screed about a virtually unrelated controversy (FYI a pipeline is the safest way to transport oil).

    I hope you will find a way to advocate for a public bank based on its own advantages, rather than on how it can be tangentially tied to some other issue that you care about. It is a worthy cause on its own merit, & doesn’t need to be promoted as a means to some other end.

    Like

We'd Like to Hear Your Thoughts:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s