Every Child Deserves a Strong and Fair Start

by Tim Burgess

In my time at Seattle City Hall I discovered something that, frankly, we don’t like to discuss or even acknowledge.

We are failing to prepare all of our children for a successful life, a reality that creates injustice and social inequity harms our long-term economic prospects, and costs all of us a lot of money. This tragic fact is most evident when we look at education achievement.

Less than half of Seattle’s low-income children and children of color are ready to begin their formal education when they walk through the door of their kindergarten classrooms, meaning they lack basic, age-expected social-emotional development, and language, cognitive, literacy and math skills. These facts are sadly clear in the Washington Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills (WaKIDS) completed each year in the first few weeks of kindergarten.

This prekindergarten preparedness failure continues into the elementary grades, too. Only about one-third of children of color in grades three to eight in Seattle Public Schools can pass basic proficiency tests in reading and math. More than three-fourths of their white peers pass. Put another way, two-thirds of our elementary-aged children of color fail because we do not adequately address vital child development needs in the crucial birth-to-five window of opportunity before they start kindergarten.

This inequity, this moral failure, has persisted in Seattle for decades and we collectively bear responsibility.

It is time to take a different, very bold and strategic approach, one that is squarely focused on making sure every child born in Seattle receives the strong and fair start they deserve, including being prepared to enter kindergarten ready to learn and thrive. And I mean every child, regardless of their neighborhood, their family economic status, or the color of their skin.

This is vital work we should all embrace because children entering kindergarten without basic, ready-to-learn-and-thrive skills face a steep climb. For most, it’s too steep a climb, and they will never catch up, as the evidence shows. And this reality not only harms these children and their families, but all of us in higher social-service costs, failure to prepare our future workforce and unnecessary criminal-justice system involvement.

This terrible American — and Seattle — tragedy is well documented in “Cradle to Kindergarten: A New Plan to Combat Inequality” by Ajay Chaudry, Taryn Morrissey, Christina Weiland and Hirokazu Yoshikawa. Citing their research and successful programs, these scholars agree we should invest very early in the lives of children in high-quality programs designed to enhance brain development, prepare kids for kindergarten and support parents.

Now, we’ve taken some great steps to address this crucial issue. Soon, Washington will have the most progressive paid-family-leave program in the country, a key ingredient for supporting families and children. We are raising the minimum wage. Washington — and especially Seattle — has a high-quality preschool program for our 3- and 4-year olds that is meeting expectations.

But we can and must do more. Here’s how.

First, let’s align the various programs we invest in today and make certain no child slips through the cracks. We have the evidence of what works. But, these efforts need to be taken to scale so all children benefit. This will require strategic, integrated programs as opposed to a silo approach, which, frankly, is far too common with government investments today. Universal adoption of tested and effective programs like the Nurse-Family Partnership, Parent-Child Home Program, school-based health clinics, quality child care and the Seattle Preschool Program will do wonders for all Seattle kids.

Second, let’s strengthen the city government relationship with Seattle Public Schools and forge a new partnership that is keenly focused on preparing our children for kindergarten and then making sure they receive the quality education they deserve. City and school-district leaders should jointly plan for this fall’s renewal of the city’s expiring Families & Education Levy and the Seattle Preschool Program Levy, and then the 2019 school levies.

Third, let’s make certain we are preparing kids for the 21st-century economy we have by adopting school-to-job apprenticeships like some European countries already do. Our business community is ready to step up and support this type of career-building path if it is well managed and accountable.

The status quo where thousands of Seattle children of color and low-income children face a bleak future because we are not adequately preparing them to enter kindergarten should jar us to take bold, corrective action now.

City government should focus its limited taxpayer dollars where they will have the greatest impact — in the first few years of a child’s life. The sticker shock felt over the massive property tax increase just imposed means the city government should tighten its belt, reduce the overall tax rate of the city education levies and invest those dollars in cradle-to-kindergarten services.

Why does this matter? Because all our children deserve a strong and fair start in life. And with that strong and fair start, our children will be prepared to lead, to fuel innovation, to sustain the economy and to advance the common good.

The compelling case for early, strategic investments has been clearly established through research. Let’s rally ourselves to do what’s right for our kids. The future of Seattle will be stronger and more secure if we do.


 Tim Burgess served 10 years as a City Council member and mayor of Seattle. He was the primary architect of the Seattle Preschool Program.

 

 

2 thoughts on “Every Child Deserves a Strong and Fair Start”

  1. Let’s go thru this op-ed (which apparently Burgess is shopping around as it already appeared in the Times).

    This prekindergarten preparedness failure continues into the elementary grades, too.

    Burgess (and others) are taking this idea of “pre-K preparedness” and have translated that into a 6-hour “academic day.” Is that truly what 3 and 4 year olds need? The most current assessment of the City’s Pre-K program shows they are doing a good job with the socio-emotional factors and I think that’s great. But the academics? Just so-so.

    I am all for Pre-K but I think young children need to learn thru play, some of it unstructured. Any early childhood expert would tell you that’s developmentally appropriate.

    Burgess speaks of “this moral failure” – whose is that? Mine, his, everyone’s? I’m not sure trying to shaming people is the way to get them on your side.

    “Second, let’s strengthen the city government relationship with Seattle Public Schools and forge a new partnership that is keenly focused on preparing our children for kindergarten and then making sure they receive the quality education they deserve. City and school-district leaders should jointly plan for this fall’s renewal of the city’s expiring Families & Education Levy and the Seattle Preschool Program Levy, and then the 2019 school levies.”

    There’s much to unpack in that paragraph.

    1) When Burgess was in office, I saw little of this “strengthening” of the relationship between SPS and the City. The City siphoned off one of the best principals. The City has never worked with the district on the issue of charter schools and that’s curious. I myself could never get Burgess to even tell me his stand on charters.

    2) A new partnership?

    Tell me, does a partner undercut the basic work of the other partner? Because that’s what the City is doing in allowing charter schools to get zoning departures that are in direct violation of city code.

    Tell me, does a partner continue to pressure the other partner for space for a City program like pre-K when SPS is nearly full and struggling with capacity issues?

    Tell me, does a partner ask for free space (and maintenance of that space) and yet charge the other partner space…for years? (This is the City getting free pre-k space at several schools and yet charging the district for space at Seattle Center for a small high school for decades.)

    Tell me, does a partner like the City only pay out part of the costs for the pre-K program to the district, holding back 25% of the district makes performance measures? And even after the district proves it can, the City still continues to hold that money back?

    Tell me more about this partnership, Mr. Burgess.

    3) As for the F&E levy, well, that’s quite a conundrum. Is the pre-K levy going to be rolled into it? Will the City be adding charter schools into it? What about the money that the Mayor wants for her community college program?

    The F&E levy, if pre-K is rolled in, will be hugely expensive. And then taxpayers will come back in Feb. 2019 and vote for the district’s two on-going levies for operations and capital needs? I suspect someone is going to lose and maybe the district should put their levies first and see what happens.

    “Third, let’s make certain we are preparing kids for the 21st-century economy we have by adopting school-to-job apprenticeships like some European countries already do. Our business community is ready to step up and support this type of career-building path if it is well managed and accountable.

    Great, the district has a kick-ass leader of CTE at SPS who would love to hear from these business types.”

    City government should focus its limited taxpayer dollars where they will have the greatest impact — in the first few years of a child’s life. The sticker shock felt over the massive property tax increase just imposed means the city government should tighten its belt, reduce the overall tax rate of the city education levies and invest those dollars in cradle-to-kindergarten services.

    I’m not going to disagree this is important – I volunteer in a Title One school in a kindergarten class so I know the need. But the County did pass its own “Best Starts” levy so that should count for something. I suspect what we are hearing is the slow draining off of funding to SPS from the City.

    I don’t think that’s what a partner does either.

    Melissa Westbrook
    Seattle Schools Community Forum blog

    Like

We'd Like to Hear Your Thoughts:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s