by Ashley Archibald
(This article was originally published on Real Change and has been reprinted under an agreement.)
More than 2,000 units of housing in King County alone could stop being affordable by the end of the decade because of the expiration of federal tax credits that locked in affordability for 30 years.
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program provides financing options to developers in exchange for below-market rents. The credits are often used to finance the construction of properties but can also be applied to maintenance and acquisition of existing buildings.
However, they expire after 30 years, and the IRS stops auditing them after 15, leaving the fate of thousands of affordable housing units up in the air. Owners of the buildings can sell to a for-profit owner, for instance, or otherwise mark up the units to market rate.
While King County-based nonprofit organizations — which the state refers to as “mission-driven” entities — with tax credits expiring this decade say they have no intention of hiking rates, the threat of the credits’ expiration has had real-world consequences in other places.
In March, Oregon Public Broadcasting reporter Alex Zielinski wrote about a move by Washington County to buy the 172-unit Woodspring Apartments complex that houses many low-income seniors in order to preserve affordability — the tax credits expired in 2021, and the company that had purchased the building five years earlier announced that year that it would be hiking rents.
Organizing led by tenants and supporters caught the attention of local government leaders who said they would intervene to buy the property. While Woodspring may be saved, it was a one-off deal, leaving thousands of other units across Oregon in limbo.
According to Washington State records, 24 properties totaling 2,071 units will hit the 30-year mark between 2023 and 2029 in King County alone. Statewide, that figure leaps to 5,531 units.
The LIHTC program was established through the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Given that credits have a 30-year timeline, the state doesn’t have much experience in these projects expiring. About a dozen expired in 2022, and the Washington State Housing Finance Commission (WSHFC) expects a similar number this year, said Melissa Donahue, manager of Asset Management and Compliance with WSHFC.
In some cases, these units are not going to come back, Donahue said, but WSHFC mainly lends to those mission-driven housing providers.
“The folks that are mission-driven housing providers, their goal is to keep all these projects affordable housing for as long as they can,” Donahue said.
DESC, also known as the Downtown Emergency Service Center, is one of the largest housing and shelter providers in the region, and it has used tax credits in its projects. However, it’s never had credits expire, wrote Claire Tuohy-Morgan, communications and community relations manager with DESC, in an email.
That will change this year: Tax credits on the Union Hotel building — with 50 units of affordable housing located in downtown Seattle — will expire on Dec. 31, 2023.
Other funders for the building outside of the tax credits require the Union Hotel to stay affordable for 50 years, two decades from now.
“As a mission-based nonprofit, we have no interest in raising the rents, evicting tenants into homelessness and operating a market rate apartment building,” Tuohy-Morgan wrote. “If we were ever to sell a building after the tax credits expire and pay off the loans, removing the rent restrictions, it would not be done lightly.”
The organization expects that it will be able to negotiate extensions or get new loans on the buildings to keep them available to low-income households, she wrote.
Sales to outside organizations aren’t frequent, but they do happen. At least five buildings belonging to nonprofit housing providers that were funded with tax credits have been sold before the 30-year credit period was up, according to research by Camille Gix of House Our Neighbors!, a project of Real Change that campaigned to pass the I-135 social housing initiative in February. (Disclosure: Gix was an intern of the Real Change Advocacy Department when she did this research.)
So, how do LIHTCs work? Warning: This is about to get wonky.
The tax credit program is made up of two funding types: the 9% program and the 4% program. The 9% program is pure tax credits, usually used to build or rehab a building. If a housing provider uses 9% LIHTCs, the bulk of its funding is coming from tax credits.
The 4% program pairs LIHTCs with tax-exempt bonds, another financing tool. This can get complex. According to the 2023 WSHFC policy document for the program, there is no federal cap on 4% tax credits if more than half of a project is financed by bonds issued by the commission.
However, while the tax credits aren’t limited, there is a cap on the amount of bonds the state will issue, determined by the state’s population. Of that bond cap, 42% can go toward housing.
When multifamily bonds are oversubscribed — as they have been for many years — the commission announces a “bond round,” which means competition for the bonds. In 2022, 21 applications requested allocations totaling $561 million, but only 10 of those received allocations totaling $249.3 million.
The federal government does limit the amount of credits available through the 9% program. In the November 2022 application round for 9% credits for 2023, $32.3 million in requests were chasing $16.7 million in credits, according to the 2023 allocation list.
Most housing finance authorities use a pretty even mix of the two programs, but WSHFC’s mix of 4%and 9% LIHTCs leans a bit more heavily than most toward the 4% program, Donahue said.
Finally, a twist: Tax credits are sold to investors, because most nonprofit organizations don’t have sufficient tax liability to make them worthwhile. That’s how the credits generate cash flow for the projects.
The need for affordable housing in Washington State means more projects are chasing more credits and bonds than are available.
Every year, the National Low Income Housing Coalition produces a report called “The Gap,” which looks at the difference between the supply of and demand for affordable housing. According to the 2023 report, issued in March, Washington State needs 174,821 units of housing affordable to people with extremely low incomes — 30% or less of the area median income (AMI) — and 220,225 units of housing affordable to people at 50% of AMI or below.
While the potential loss of units may seem dire, Donahue cautioned against alarm.
Subsequent rounds of LIHTC allocations mean more units will come online even as some come off the books, and many will remain affordable either because mission-driven housing providers ensure it or housing providers go through a “rescindication process,” meaning they receive another allocation to rehab an aging building.
Ashley Archibald is the editor of Real Change News and a freelance journalist with previous work in the Santa Monica Daily Press and the Union Democrat. Her work focuses on policy and economic development, and you can find it in the South Seattle Emerald, KNKX, and the Urbanist.
📸 Featured Image: Union Hotel in Pioneer Square is operated by DESC. The funding supporting affordable housing like this building is set to expire at the end of the year. (Photo: Henry Behrens)
Before you move on to the next story … The South Seattle Emerald is brought to you by Rainmakers. Rainmakers give recurring gifts at any amount. With over 1,000 Rainmakers, the Emerald is truly community-driven local media. Help us keep BIPOC-led media free and accessible. If just half of our readers signed up to give $6 a month, we wouldn't have to fundraise for the rest of the year. Small amounts make a difference. We cannot do this work without you. Become a Rainmaker today!